Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Sparer Law Group Files Class Action Against Oppenheimer Bond Fund

The Sparer Law Group has filed the first class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who purchased the Oppenheimer California Municipal Fund (Symbols: OPCAX, OCABX, OCACX) between September 27, 2006 and November 28, 2008. The case was filed on February 4, 2009 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, case number C 09-00567 SI. See our press release here.


The lawsuit alleges that the Fund's Registration Statements and Prospectuses misled investors about the Fund's investment objectives and underlying risk by describing the Fund as seeking current income "consistent with preservation of capital." The Fund lost over 41% of its net asset value ("NAV") in 2008. By comparison, the average loss for funds within the same Lipper peer group over this period was only 11.5%.

"The promise that a municipal bond fund follows a strategy designed to preserve capital cannot be just a sales pitch. It has to be reflected in an objective investment approach," said Alan W. Sparer, lead counsel. "Investors put their 'safe' money and retirement savings in muni bonds. These funds are not the place for speculative strategies or junk bond investments."

The lawsuit alleges that the Oppenheimer California Municipal Fund policies and operations ignored the preservation of capital objective by concentrating 78% of its assets in bonds rated at the lowest investment grade or below, and concentrating 60% in bonds that were not rated by any independent rating agency. In addition, 33% of the Fund's investments were placed in Dirt Bonds, which are based on contracts for land developments that have not been built yet and were especially vulnerable to the recent declines in California's real estate market.

In addition, the lawsuit alleges that Oppenheimer failed to disclose that, because of the Fund's overconcentration in lower rated bonds and bonds that had not been rated by any independent agency, there was a significant risk that more than 25% of its assets were in junk bonds, a violation of the Fund's fundamental investment policy.

The NAV of the Oppenheimer California Municipal Fund decreased by more than $1.1 billion in 2008.

A copy of the complaint is available here.

Investors who lost money in the Oppenheimer bond funds should contact the Sparer Law Group to investigate potential avenues for recovery.

9 comments:

Ericwipe287 said...

In such cases, investors should be more aware. They should read the offer document care fully as any small clause can change the decision of court in legal matters.

Personal Injury attorney Houston

Anonymous said...

I am very glad to see such information which I was searching for a long time.

Auto Accident Attorney Houston

darrell moddy said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
darrell moddy said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

I really like following your blog as the articles are so simple to read and follow. Excellent. Please keep up the good work. Thanks.
Stubby holders

Anonymous said...

I’m late to find this post but wow, this should be great. May not get any better…


mobile phone accessories

Anonymous said...

hi, I just wanted to say how much i enjoy reading your blog. in a world full of spin, it's nice to get some fact-based analysis. keep up the good work.


promotional keyrings

Unknown said...

Thank you for the update. I will use for sure your resources in the near future.
Commodity tips
Stock Market
Share Market
Nse Tips
Bse Tips

Unknown said...

Excellent post.I want to thank you for this informative read, I really appreciate sharing this great post.
Intraday Nifty Future Tips
Share market tips
Share and Earn.